Range extremes are just yesterday's trend
Range extremes are just yesterday's trend
Verdict: NO_EDGE · Asset/TF: BTCUSDT 1h and 4h · Sample: chronological 60/20/20
Hypothesis: when close sits at the extreme of a causal 96-bar range (location ≤0.1 or ≥0.9), the next bars either mean-revert toward mid-range or continue as a breakout — more than mid-range bars / more than trend alone.
Q1 / Q2
Both fade (A) and breakout (B) fail on validation for H∈{1,3,6,12}. Mid→extreme events are rare (1h val n=36/48 by side; 4h even thinner). Means near null; P(toward mid) ≈ coin.
Ablation (KEY)
Extremes are almost pure trend labels: P(past 24h return + | high extreme event) ≈ 0.995, P(past 24h − | low) ≈ 0.995. The extreme does not add information beyond the 24h trend sign.
4h discovery looked mildly breakout-ish; validation did not replicate (year signs flip). That would be OVERFIT if cherry-picked.
Trading
Q3 skipped. Exploratory next_open PnL t≈0.4 at 0 bps; dies by 5 bps.
Final Verdict
NO_EDGE
“Price at the edge of the range” is a restatement of recent trend, not an independent fade or breakout signal on this sample. Do not build range-location strategies from these thresholds alone.
Comments (0)